top of page


There’s something undeniably appealing about herbal teas in skincare. Chamomile, lavender, calendula—these ingredients feel gentle, natural, and nurturing. Many DIY formulators are drawn to the idea of brewing a tea and incorporating it directly into lotions, creams, or toners.


But from a formulation and safety standpoint, herbal teas are one of the most problematic ingredients you can introduce into a water-based cosmetic product.



Let’s break down exactly why.


1. Herbal Teas Are a Microbial Playground


When you brew a tea, you are essentially creating a nutrient-rich aqueous environment. This is exactly what bacteria, yeast, and mold thrive in.



Herbal teas contain:

  • Plant sugars

  • Proteins

  • Trace minerals

  • Organic compounds


These components feed microorganisms, making contamination not just possible—but highly likely.


Even if your tea looks clean:

Microbial growth can begin within hours

Many contaminants are invisible in early stages

You cannot rely on smell or appearance to assess safety


This is especially critical for leave-on products, where contamination can lead to skin irritation, infection, or product spoilage.


2. They Can Overwork (and Even Break) Your Preservative System


A properly designed cosmetic formulation includes a broad-spectrum preservative system

that is carefully selected based on:

  • Water activity

  • pH

  • Ingredient compatibility

  • Microbial load


When you add herbal tea, you are introducing:

An unknown microbial load

Organic matter that preservatives must neutralize

Electrolytes and plant compounds that can interfere with preservative efficacy


What does this mean in practice?


Your preservative now has to:

Work harder to control contamination

Compete with organic material that may bind or deactivate it

Handle a higher risk of microbial bloom


This can lead to:

Reduced shelf life

Preservation failure

Hidden contamination despite using a preservative


👉 In short: You are pushing your preservative system beyond what it was designed to

handle.


3. Lack of Standardization = Unpredictable Formulations


Every time you brew a tea, it is different.



Variables include:

Steeping time

Temperature

Herb quality and age

Plant concentration

Water quality


This creates zero consistency, which is a major issue in formulation.


From a cosmetic chemistry perspective:

You cannot accurately calculate your formula

You cannot predict stability

You cannot reproduce results


👉 This goes against one of the most important principles of formulation: repeatability and

control.


4. Stability Issues Beyond Microbes


Herbal teas don’t just introduce microbes—they can also destabilize your formula.


Common issues include:

pH drift (plant materials can shift pH over time)

Color changes (oxidation of plant compounds)

Odor changes (degradation of organic material)

Emulsion instability due to electrolytes


Over time, your product may:

Separate

Thin out

Change color

Develop off odors


👉 These are all signs of an unstable and potentially unsafe product.


5. Cosmetic Extracts Are the Superior Choice

If you want the benefits of botanicals, there is a professional and safe way to do it: use

cosmetic-grade extracts.




Cosmetic extracts are:

Standardized for consistency

Preserved or low in microbial risk

Designed for formulation compatibility

Available in various bases (glycerin, water, propanediol, oil-soluble)



Why they’re better:

You know exactly what you’re adding

They are easier to preserve

They are tested for stability

They integrate cleanly into formulations


👉 This allows you to create safe, stable, and reproducible products, which is the goal of

any serious formulator.


6. Where Herbal Teas Do Belong


Herbal teas are not completely off-limits—they just need to be used appropriately.


They are great for:

  • Bath soaks

  • Bath teas

  • Foot soaks




Why this works:

The product is used immediately

It is not stored as a preserved system

There is no long-term microbial risk


Using a tea sachet keeps plant material contained and prevents mess while still delivering a

beautiful user experience.


👉 This is where herbal teas shine—not in preserved, water-based cosmetics.


Final Thoughts

As a formulator, your responsibility goes beyond creating something that looks or feels

good—you are creating products that must be safe, stable, and reliable over time.


Herbal teas:

  • Introduce unpredictable microbial contamination

  • Overload preservative systems

  • Create instability and inconsistency


While they may feel “natural,” they are not formulation-friendly ingredients for water-based

products.


Instead:

✔ Use cosmetic-grade botanical extracts

✔ Build formulations with controlled, tested inputs

✔ Reserve herbal teas for rinse-off, immediate-use products like bath soaks


Bottom Line

Just because something is natural doesn’t mean it belongs in a formulation.

Professional formulation is about control—and herbal teas take that control away.



 Join our Patreon and Get Instant Access to Exclusive Formulations, Tutorials, and a Supportive Community!



 
 
 

If there’s one area where formulators—especially beginners—tend to take risks, it’s fragrance

usage. Whether working with fragrance oils or essential oils, exceeding recommended limits can

turn an otherwise beautiful formulation into a product that is unsafe, irritating, or even

non-compliant for sale.


This is where the International Fragrance Association (IFRA) comes in.


Understanding and following IFRA usage rates is not optional—it is a "critical part of safe,

professional cosmetic formulation".


What is IFRA?


The International Fragrance Association (IFRA) is the global authority that sets safety

standards for fragrance ingredients used in cosmetics and personal care products.


They work alongside scientific bodies like "Research Institute for Fragrance Materials (RIFM)"

to evaluate:


  • Skin irritation potential

  • Sensitization risks (allergic reactions)

  • Phototoxicity (sun-reactive ingredients)

  • Systemic toxicity


From this research, IFRA publishes maximum safe usage levels for fragrance materials in

different product types.


Why IFRA Usage Rates Matter?


1. Skin Safety & Irritation Prevention


Fragrance materials are made up of **complex chemical compounds**, many of which can

cause:


  • Skin irritation

  • Allergic contact dermatitis

  • Sensitization over time


Even natural essential oils are highly concentrated chemical mixtures, not inherently “safe” simply because they are natural.


➡️ IFRA limits are designed to prevent long-term skin damage, not just immediate irritation.


2. Product Type Changes Everything


One of the biggest mistakes formulators make is assuming:


“If 1% is safe, it’s safe in every product.”


This is "completely incorrect".


A fragrance that is safe at 1% in a candle or rinse-off product may only be safe at **0.2% in a leave-on product**.


Why?

  • Leave-on products stay on the skin longer

  • Lip products may be ingested

  • Eye-area products require extreme caution

  • Broken or shaved skin increases absorption


IFRA accounts for real-world exposure scenarios.


How to Read an IFRA Certificate

Every fragrance oil from a reputable supplier should come with an IFRA Certificate.


This document tells you:

  • The maximum usage % allowed

  • For each IFRA category

  • Based on the current IFRA amendment (e.g., 49th, 50th)


Example:


A fragrance may state:


  • Category 5 (Lotions): 0.8% max

  • Category 9 (Body Wash): 2.5% max


This means:


  • You must not exceed 0.8% in a lotion

  • But you *can* go higher in rinse-off products


The Hidden Risk: Overexposure & Sensitization

One of the most important reasons to follow IFRA guidelines is cumulative exposure.


Your customer is not using just your product.


They are using:

  • Body wash

  • Lotion

  • Perfume

  • Deodorant


All containing fragrance.


Even if each product is "within limits,” overuse can lead to:

  • Skin sensitization

  • Chronic irritation

  • Long-term intolerance to fragrance


IFRA limits are designed with aggregate exposure in mind.


Essential Oils vs Fragrance Oils: A Critical Note


A common misconception:

“Essential oils are safer than fragrance oils.”


This is not true.


Essential oils often contain:

  • High levels of allergens (like limonene, linalool)

  • Phototoxic compounds (like bergapten in citrus oils)


They are subject to **the same IFRA restrictions**.


Regulatory & Business Implications

If you are selling products, ignoring IFRA guidelines can lead to:

  • Product recalls

  • Customer injury claims

  • Insurance issues

  • Non-compliance with cosmetic regulations


Following IFRA is part of:

  • Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP)

  • Responsible formulation

  • Professional product development


Fragrance is one of the most enjoyable parts of formulation—but also one of the most chemically complex and potentially problematic.


Following IFRA usage rates ensures that your products are:


✔ Safe

✔ Professional

✔ Compliant

✔ Skin-friendly long term


As formulators, our responsibility goes beyond creating products that look and smell good—we must create products that are safe for repeated, long-term use.



 Join our Patreon and Get Instant Access to Exclusive Formulations, Tutorials, and a Supportive Community!








 
 
 


A Real Talk from Your Cosmetic Chemist


If you’ve been in my community for any length of time, you already know this: I love safe,

well-formulated products. I love transparency. I love ingredient literacy. And I love empowering you with real science.


But there is one trend that continues to grow louder every year — the idea of “non-toxic” and “chemical-free” cosmetics.


Let’s talk about it honestly.


Because the truth is... the phrase “chemical-free” doesn’t mean what people think it means.


Everything Is a Chemical


Everything.

Water? A chemical.

Oxygen? A chemical.

Shea butter? A mixture of chemicals.


Lavender essential oil? A complex blend of hundreds of naturally occurring chemical

compounds.


The word chemical simply refers to a substance with a defined molecular structure.

Water is H2O — two hydrogen atoms bonded to one oxygen atom. That’s chemistry.

And here’s something important I teach my students:


Even water can be deadly.

If you inhale too much water, you can drown.

If you drink excessive amounts in a short period, you can develop water intoxication

(hyponatremia), which can be life-threatening.


Does that make water toxic?

No.

It means dose and exposure matter.


And that’s where most online fear-based marketing falls apart.


“Non-Toxic” Is Not a Scientific Category

In toxicology, nothing is inherently “toxic” or “non-toxic.”

There is:

  • Hazard

  • Dose

  • Route of exposure

  • Duration of exposure

  • Population risk


This is foundational toxicology.


Even vitamin A (retinol) can be toxic at high doses.

Even essential oils — yes, even the “natural” ones — can cause sensitization, irritation, or

systemic toxicity when misused.


The famous quote from Paracelsus still holds true:

“The dose makes the poison.”

That principle has not changed in 500 years.


Why “Non-Toxic” Claims Can Create Compliance Issues?

Here’s the part many brands don’t realize:

Advertising a cosmetic product or ingredient as “non-toxic” can create regulatory problems.

Why?

Because calling your product “non-toxic” implicitly suggests that competing cosmetic products, including those formulated with FDA- or Health Canada–approved raw materials are toxic.


That implication can be interpreted as:

  • Misleading comparative advertising

  • Fear-based marketing

  • Unsupported safety superiority claims


Regulatory agencies do not recognize “non-toxic” as a defined cosmetic classification. There is no formal threshold that qualifies a product as “toxic” or “non-toxic.” Cosmetics are required to be safe for their intended use under labeled conditions — period.


When a brand markets something as “non-toxic,” it can be viewed as:

  • An unsubstantiated safety claim

  • A disparaging claim against legally compliant products

  • A misleading oversimplification of toxicology


In recent years, regulatory bodies have paid closer attention to these types of marketing claims because of the alarming rise in fear-driven campaigns.


The Rise of Fear-Based Marketing


We’ve seen a significant trend of marketing built on:

  • “Toxin-free”

  • “Chemical-free”

  • “Free from poisons”

  • “No dangerous chemicals”


These phrases are designed to trigger anxiety.


But cosmetics sold legally in North America and the EU are already required to meet safety

standards. Approved raw materials are assessed for:


  • Dermal exposure limits

  • Margin of safety

  • Reproductive toxicity data

  • Irritation and sensitization potential

  • Cumulative exposure


Suggesting that other compliant cosmetic products are “toxic” undermines public trust in

regulatory systems and in science.


And that’s exactly why regulators have begun discouraging — and in some contexts challenging — these types of claims.


The Problem With “Ingredient Scanner” Apps


Let’s talk about the apps.

You’ve probably seen them. You scan a barcode and instantly get a red, yellow, or green rating.

Sounds empowering, right?

Here’s what they don’t tell you:


1. They Do Not Account for Percentage Used


An ingredient used at 0.2% is not the same as an ingredient used at 20%.


Cosmetic formulas are built in percentages. Many ingredients flagged as “dangerous” are used at extremely low, regulated levels that fall far below toxicological thresholds.


Toxicology is math.

Apps rarely show you the math.


2. They Ignore Method of Exposure


There is a massive difference between:

  • Inhalation

  • Ingestion

  • Leave-on dermal exposure

  • Rinse-off dermal exposure


An ingredient studied at high oral doses in animal models is not equivalent to applying 0.5% in a rinse-off cleanser.

Exposure pathway matters.

A lot.


3. They Don’t Account for Regulatory Limits


Cosmetic chemists formulate within:

  • IFRA guidelines (for fragrance)

  • Health Canada regulations

  • FDA regulations

  • EU Cosmetic Regulation

  • SCCS safety assessments

  • CIR reviews


These regulatory frameworks are built on toxicological data and safety margins.

Apps often simplify decades of safety science into a color code.

Science is not a traffic light.


Natural Does Not Automatically Mean Safer


This is one I say often in my classes.


Poison ivy is natural.

Arsenic is natural.

Botulinum toxin is natural.

Nature is chemistry.


Synthetic ingredients are not automatically harmful. Natural ingredients are not automatically

safe.


What matters is:

  • Purity

  • Stability

  • Concentration

  • Formulation compatibility

  • Preservative system

  • Packaging

  • Consumer usage patterns


When I formulate, I’m thinking about all of that.


Fear-Based Marketing Hurts Small Brands

This is something I care deeply about.

I’ve watched beginner formulators panic because an app labeled one ingredient in their formula as “toxic.”


Often that ingredient:

  • Has decades of safe cosmetic use

  • Is approved globally

  • Is used well below safety thresholds

  • Is necessary for stability or preservation


And now the formulator feels shame or fear.

That’s not how education should work.

We should empower people with understanding — not scare them with oversimplification.


Why Long Names Sound Scary

“Sodium Hyaluronate” sounds scarier than “hyaluronic acid,” right?

But they are related forms of the same molecule.

“Phenoxyethanol” sounds more intimidating than “rose essential oil.”


Yet rose essential oil contains natural components that are far more likely to cause sensitization than properly used phenoxyethanol.


The length of a name does not determine its safety. Remember, ingredient lists are not written in layman’s terms. They are written in INCI (International Nomenclature of Cosmetic

Ingredients), which uses a combination of Latin (for botanicals), English (for common materials), and scientific chemical nomenclature.


Chemistry terminology is descriptive — not dangerous.


As a cosmetic chemist — and as someone who built this career to make sure my own family

had safer products — I promise you this:

Science is on your side.


Let’s move away from fear-based marketing and toward ingredient literacy. Let’s make and love natural products for the right reasons.


That’s how we truly create safer cosmetics.


— Kennece

Your Cosmetic Chemist

 
 
 
bottom of page